DrayTek UK Users' Community Forum
Help, Advice and Solutions from DrayTek Users
Mitigating the risks of leaving 443 open on a Vigor 2765 for remote access
- talkingcats
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 23
- Thank yous received: 0
12 Feb 2026 11:43 - 12 Feb 2026 11:48 #106026
by talkingcats
Mitigating the risks of leaving 443 open on a Vigor 2765 for remote access was created by talkingcats
Hi, I occasionally have a need for VPNing into my home network when away. I use the SSL VPN with a dial-in user and the DrayVPN app on my Ipad to make the connection.
Presently I enable 443 only when I eppect to need to use it. So most of the time it stays closed. I have a stong password enabled on the dial in user. The user connects to LAN1 where my hosts and their data stores are located. None of my hosts have 443 enabled. The 2765 is kept up to date with patches, particularly after all the vulnerabilities found in 2025!
Does anyone have any suggestions what else I could do? I run a segmented network with firewall rules preventing LAN2, LAN3 and LAN4 from accessing hosts on LAN1. One thought I had was to put the host I usually need access to on LAN4 which is currently unused. But that is also a faff and I am not sure it gives me much extra protection. Would I be better off using a different protocol? The app supports IPsec IKE2 EasyVPN. IPsec would be way OTT for a home user!. I don't have much sense of how secure this technology is, which is why I have been strictly limiting the times when 443 is exposted on the internet
Any suggests gratefully received. Thanks
Presently I enable 443 only when I eppect to need to use it. So most of the time it stays closed. I have a stong password enabled on the dial in user. The user connects to LAN1 where my hosts and their data stores are located. None of my hosts have 443 enabled. The 2765 is kept up to date with patches, particularly after all the vulnerabilities found in 2025!
Does anyone have any suggestions what else I could do? I run a segmented network with firewall rules preventing LAN2, LAN3 and LAN4 from accessing hosts on LAN1. One thought I had was to put the host I usually need access to on LAN4 which is currently unused. But that is also a faff and I am not sure it gives me much extra protection. Would I be better off using a different protocol? The app supports IPsec IKE2 EasyVPN. IPsec would be way OTT for a home user!. I don't have much sense of how secure this technology is, which is why I have been strictly limiting the times when 443 is exposted on the internet
Any suggests gratefully received. Thanks
Last edit: 12 Feb 2026 11:48 by talkingcats.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ianfretwell
- Offline
- Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 219
- Thank yous received: 18
12 Feb 2026 15:49 #106033
by ianfretwell
Replied by ianfretwell on topic Mitigating the risks of leaving 443 open on a Vigor 2765 for remote access
Change the port from 443 - at least make them work to find the opening in the first place!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Admin3, Christopher
